View unanswered posts | View active topics


Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
  
 Post subject: Housing for Box Style Cameras In Corrosive Environment
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:12 am 
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Alberta

Offline
I going to install some ACTi 5611's in standard weatherproof housings next month at a potash mine. Just wondering if anyone has a suggestion for a housing which will stand up better to salt water, salt spray and just a lot of salt? I was considering spraying the housing with a coat of silicone just to help protect the finish but figured there might be something out there that you folks who live near the ocean or have done installs in similar conditions could recommend.

Thanks a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:30 am 
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 15515
Location: Bahamas

Offline
the Extreme CCTV EX82 housings hold up real well :D
Actually if you can find some damaged ones you could just gut them and place your camera inside that. I just saw someone with 6 bad ones here that got hit by lightning .. would have been perfect but they still want to hold onto them for some reason. I have them 10 years now right on the beach through all the hurricanes and all. I just gutted another one also but left the IR to use that, works well with a rather cheap IR bullet instead of the client buying a new EX82 (cameras were bad).

I guess other than that the big brands should have something.


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:48 am 
User avatar

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 665
Location: Australia

Offline
look for 'explosion proof' housings they are made of SS steel


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:01 pm 
User avatar
Installer
Installer

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2055
Location: The Burbs of Vancouver

Offline
I don't know about ocean air specifically, but we've been using Pelco EH3512-series housings in car washes for many years - the exteriors get pretty nasty with the soap buildup and corrosion and the paint coming off, but the cameras stay clean and pristine inside.

_________________
Matt Ion, Omnigeek
LPS Loss Prevention Systems - Maple Ridge, BC

------------------
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.

Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Alberta

Offline
Thanks for the ideas. The Pelcos are very similar to what I am going to try first, with an application of silicone spray on the top, back, and sides just for good measure. They will get sprayed with a pressure washer from time to time as well (IP66 rated). The stainless steel housings definitely look like the way to go for the next phase. Especially the units with the washer/wiper combination. Appreciate the suggestions. :)


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:50 pm 
Integrator
Integrator

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 361

Offline
The 3512's hold up reasonably well, and you may want to check the price comparison for stainless stuff, last time I checked, you could replace the 3512's a few times, with labor, and still break even on cost...

BTW, the washer/ wipers tend to scratch the heck out of the front window, you should probably just plan on a regular cleaning schedule.


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Alberta

Offline
hardwired wrote:
The 3512's hold up reasonably well, and you may want to check the price comparison for stainless stuff, last time I checked, you could replace the 3512's a few times, with labor, and still break even on cost...

BTW, the washer/ wipers tend to scratch the heck out of the front window, you should probably just plan on a regular cleaning schedule.


Yeah, I did some looking around and you are correct about prices on the stainless steel housings. They are more expensive than the cameras. But this is one of those installations where the customer is not concerned about cost as the system is being used to monitor equipment for break downs, equipment becoming jammed or critical areas where machine failure is imminent, so if the system can save them from sudden downtime it pays for itself very, very quickly.

And good point about the wipers. The way the areas is cleaned is by having a guy walk around with a pressure wand washing things down. I was thinking that if there is some left over residue on the window then the washer/wiper could be used to remove it.


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 8:07 pm 
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 15515
Location: Bahamas

Offline
I forgot, I have these up at a couple locations near the ocean also, been up for several years now without any major corrosion.

http://www.gesecurity.com/portal/site/G ... &seriesID=


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Alberta

Offline
It will be interesting to see how well the standard IP66 rated aluminum housings last. Thinking about it, I suppose it is tough to tell how well they will stand up in an environment with such a high salt content -much worse than ocean spray. I know this might sound nuts (and make you question whether I might be the guy connecting Bushnell binocular lenses to an IR camera and using it to zoom in on objects), but I was thinking even if applying a layer of heavy duty shrink wrap to the camera housing just to help protect the finish and improve the chances of the seals lasting by applying a seam of silicone where the housing clamps down. I suppose if the housings begin to prematurely corrode I could replace them with a stainless steel housings. It is a long term project with the plan to install at least 32 1.3MP IP cameras over the next little while so I will have the opportunity to change things. Still, it would be nice to do it right the first time out without going totally overkill.


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:20 am 
Integrator
Integrator

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 361

Offline
I have cameras in two production area rooms where they mix salt into solution. In one, I installed a stainless Pelco DF5 dome, with a small Ikegami WDR cube cam.. Works fine, but $$$$.

In another, I have a Pelco EH3512, and a ICS101 dome in place. The powdercoat is starting to peel on them, but the cams themselves are fine, after 2.5 years or so....


Top
 Profile  
 

  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Location: Alberta

Offline
Thank you for the information.

I think if I can get 3-5 years out of a standard housing before the thing looks as though it has been there since WW1 then everything is fine. The idea of spending, what? $500/housing for stainless steel (prices found online) versus less than $30/housing from my supplier for an aluminum housing on 32 cameras does seem a little crazy. I will just make sure to replace the fasteners with stainless steel before I perform the install.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

It is currently Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:15 am
Custom Skin by Audentio Design.

The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2003-2010 CCTVForum.com. All Rights Reserved.