EasyGion - 28 Jul 2008, 02:08 pm
I’m trying to determine the difference, end result-wise between, DC Iris and AES. My background is in photography so my first thought is that DC Iris is similar to aperture priority and AES is similar to shutter priority. Is this correct?
From what I’ve read, DC Iris is used when the camera is mounted in a location where the brightness level changes frequently. If this is correct, and DC Iris is similar to aperture priority, then the depth of field (what’s in focus) would change as the iris changes size. Is this correct?
If the iris is fixed, and the shutter speed changes, then there should be a greater likelihood of getting blurred moving objects in low light situations. Is this correct?
In photography it is possible to get the same photo using either aperture priority (DC Iris) or shutter priority (AES) from the standpoint of exposure, depth of field may be different or images may be blurred, but the image exposure would be the same.
So what’s the benefit of using DC Iris over AES, if both can product an equally well “exposed” image?
Thanks.
From what I’ve read, DC Iris is used when the camera is mounted in a location where the brightness level changes frequently. If this is correct, and DC Iris is similar to aperture priority, then the depth of field (what’s in focus) would change as the iris changes size. Is this correct?
If the iris is fixed, and the shutter speed changes, then there should be a greater likelihood of getting blurred moving objects in low light situations. Is this correct?
In photography it is possible to get the same photo using either aperture priority (DC Iris) or shutter priority (AES) from the standpoint of exposure, depth of field may be different or images may be blurred, but the image exposure would be the same.
So what’s the benefit of using DC Iris over AES, if both can product an equally well “exposed” image?
Thanks.
: