Name That Compression!!!

[amirm 0]

I am not writing my answers just for you. ... don't understand the tone of voice you are using with me.

 

Oh, I don't know, could it have been this ...

 

But I wish you would do some experimentation as others have done to see if there is a real trade off there.

 

... punctuated with video of a bush.

 

Best,

Christopher

Well, this is what I said after what you quoted:

 

"You might find that H.264 at half to a quarter of the data rate of MJPEG produces the same and maybe even better quality at times. Experiment with above tricks and search for work others have done."

 

I didn't see you having tried either.

 

And I didn't just give you a video of a bush. I provided a pair of videos that showed MJPEG outperforming H.264. And a few others including outdoor road scene.

[cglaeser 0]

And I didn't just give you a video of a bush.

 

In my experience, the difference in detail between H.264 and MJPEG begins to widen in low light with movement. Can you post any examples comparing the detail of moving vehicles and/or people at night using these two codecs?

 

Best,

Christopher

[megapixel man 0]

Their is something moving in every image.....

 

Anyone pick out the jpeg2000 image?

 

10.

 

Easy to pick when you zoom in on the image.

[thewireguys 3]

Their is something moving in every image.....

 

Anyone pick out the jpeg2000 image?

 

10.

 

Easy to pick when you zoom in on the image.

 

Yup thats the Aviglon 5MP.....that is a very impressive image. I am ordering one of them and the H.264 dome to demo and test. Also their software is fantastic just unbelievably fast.