iSpyVision

Sold a few of them. We tested them and were impressed with the software stability. Easy IP config for just about every IP camera on the market. Can be upgraded with ease as well. Low CPU usage.

The main differnce between the NV5000 and the NV6240 is the frame rate at the higher resolution of 640X480. If you build the system to avers specs the NV6240 will run at full frame rate at 640X480 res. were as the NV5000 will lower its frame rate at that res. The NV5000 is a PCI card and the NV6240 is a PCI-Express which allows the card to out perform the NV5000.

The main differnce between the NV5000 and the NV6240 is the frame rate at the higher resolution of 640X480. If you build the system to avers specs the NV6240 will run at full frame rate at 640X480 res. were as the NV5000 will lower its frame rate at that res. The NV5000 is a PCI card and the NV6240 is a PCI-Express which allows the card to out perform the NV5000.

You may have your positive and negative wrong?

I just got my 3130 today. Its a nice camera but its a strain on a network using 45% of the LAN and 100% CPU at 3MP. Will have to play with it more this weekend but looks promising if you have a beefy System.

If its a 960fps 32 channel at D1 then why is then at 12/15fps at 704X480 which D1??? That doesn't work out.

so a core 2 duo e6600 will do the job or are we talking quad core? We use the E6600 just fine

We have built a few of the 32 channel units. We will have another one done tomorrow. They are 960fps at 640X480. You have to build a beefy system to keep that rate.

The VGA res. is 640X480 and yes the NV6480 PCI express does 960fps recording at that res. with 32 channels

Unfortunatly it does not. The present controller will only let you set up a pan or tour but there is no way to set up a time schedule between the pan and the preset.

I'm looking for a PTZ controller that will allow a PTZ using Pelco D to Pan in the day until a certian time then move to a fixed position until the next morning in which it would start panning again. Any ideas? Thanks

We've sold several of these. Only complaint is noisy fans. The power supply is a special small power supply that can't be replaced with a silent unit .

I know they support Axis and Vivotek Megapixel cameras up to 1.3 megapixels. We are going to be testing some Axis 223M Day/night cameras that run at 2.0 Megapixels but we will tune it down to 1.3 to run on the Avermedia NV6480Express system. Curious to see what fram rate we get since this card will run 480fps on 16 cameras at 640X480. We want see what happens at 1.3 Megapixels.

I like aver's resolution better when using 720x480. Aver is a true 720X480 where as Geo uses a 640x480 image and stretches it to fit a 720x480. Not to mention Aver's new NV6480 express 32. Yep that's right, 960 fps on 32 cameras viewing and recording at 640X 480. Now that is cool!! We sold six of these this week already. They are also PCI express which gives them the capability to do that res at that frame rate.

Its a great system for low budget customers. The only draw back between the Geo 650 and the aver 3000 is frame rate distribution. The software allows you to adjust the frame rate up to 7.5 fps per camera but it won't let set say 1 camera to 10fps and another to 5fps like Geo does. You can only go as high as 7.5fps per camera. The next software upgrade is suppose to allow frame rate distribution feature on the lower end cards. This tends not to be a big deal but it is something to consider depending on your application.