Jump to content

ak357

Dealers
  • Content Count

    3,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ak357


  1. We are making a proposal for a customer who has all geo equipment and they want to put a couple of 360 cameras in their gyms I am thinking possibley two per gym but have not used the product and would like some input on this possible solution. I would go with the 12 mega pixel version. If I coulod get by with one that would be even better

     

    Try to do 2

    one is not enough ( unless it's small room)


  2. Hello

    we just installed around 200 hikvision IP cameras. All are H265 and H265+.

     

    I want to record all cameras on PC with H265 supports.

    I tried using iVMS4200, but i am having two big issues.

     

    1. It supports maximum 64 cameras.

    2. It does not run web server, so it is not possible to live view or view recordings on other PCs and browser.

     

    Resources are not an issue, i monitored network utilization, cpu, memory - all are under control and still can handle more cameras.

     

    What is the best way to record all 200 cameras, and which can be seen or played recordings on other browsers.

     

    Please help.

    Thanks

    I don't get it

    You installed 200 cameras without clear plan

    wow


  3. There is no such thing as closed ports for a DVR that is able to communicate with a remote device. It doesn’t work that way. Those QR code readers blow a hole in your firewall so they can communicate with outside servers or they bypass your firewall altogether allowing very easy unfettered access to your network through your DVR.

    Really?

     

    How is Team Viewer works behind firewalls?

    and lots of other P2P apps

    skype? and more

     

    "Those QR code readers blow a hole in your firewall"

    What is different in your example

    who will open ports

    you or App

    u see my point?

     

    I would suggest google and understand how certain P2P can work behind "Closed" Ports


  4. I would believe that, but I am also certain that doing manual port forwarding is much more secure. The webinars I watch from hikvision all the time indicate this to be the truth. As a hikvision authorized distributor and retailer I can’t suggest using the pt cloud function.

    so, you would keep Open ports instead Closed

    Is it good practice?


  5. Usually to use the QR code for hik OEM you need to set up pt cloud. There should be an option on the app for that. Then scan the QR code through the app and it will work. This will cut BIG holes in your firewall though so I wouldn’t recommend it. Manual port forwarding is always best.

     

    Why?

    Plz explain


  6. Try Avigilon

    Core lic

    Is there a free/cheap version? It's windows and I can't find any kind of pricing anywhere, and I've looked over the whole website without finding a trial version to try?

     

    Am I missing something?

     

    If it's expensive AND windows I have much less interest; if it's cheap and windows it may be worth putting up with windows if it's good.

     

    Why doesn't Avigilon put some useful information on their websites, like trial information, license cost or TCO estimators, or something?

    Download Avigilon server and u will get 30 days trial


  7. So while I wait to find out pricing, a bit of my observations in case it triggers some thoughts from others....

     

    Despite being Windows (I hoped for Linux) I have been trying XProtect Essentials+, as it is free and last time I looked it had a 5 day archive limit, since removed.

     

    It's a bit less slick than the NX Witness / Spectrum product, but it seems to do all the same things pretty well. Scrubbing back and forth is nicely fast (not quite as fast), and the motion search looks pretty good. Haven't found anything significant either does the other lacks so far (among what I need).

     

    One's free. Unfortunately that one runs on Windows. I use windows on my main desktop, but am not a real fan for a sit-in-the-closet-and-run server. plus I run network management on linux on the same server, so if I go with windows I'll need to get some more memory and run a VM for linux on HyperV (the reverse probably doesn't make sense since the NVR will be the biggest workhorse).

     

    I'd love any insight people have on these two (or other similar ones, especially that run on Linux for the server side).

    Try Avigilon

    Core lic


  8. I've been using Zoneminder for several years after trying various products, but wanted to look again to see if something better (better searches, more efficient archiving, etc.) Xeoma was attractive back then, even more interesting now, but their review process (especially with more than one camera) is horribly slow.

     

    I stumbled across NX Witness and had not seen it before. It has a linux version, it picked up all my Hikvision cameras quickly and well (even will change settings on them), but the most impressive thing so far is I can scrub back and forth through the video from 4 cameras (all I can do in a trial) with no delays, incredibly fast. It's own analytics of disk make it look very efficient (need to find out why -- might not be saving full resolution or something). Have yet to look at the motion detection and other features but am so impressed by the speed of archive review that it jumped to the top of my "check this out" list.

     

    Interested to hear if anyone has tried it, thoughts? Price (they are one of those who won't sell direct, have to go through a reseller, which may be a deal killer if they won't deal with a DIY'er and require someone to come "install", etc.)?

     

    Any problems over time?

    good choice

    second best after Avigilon


  9. The HD-CVI camera format is an analog signal also. It is called Composite Video Interface because it is in fact a Composite of a Sync signal at a higher rate to start the video line, a color burst to synchronize the chroma (color) carrier, a white area just like the analog signal but at a higher rate to fit all the pixels. The Color carrier for the CVI signal is in the 21MHz region as seen on a spectrum analyzer. Both the TVI and CVI signals have a vertical interval also with serrated pulses just like the analog signals of old for vertical blanking. If they were digital signals you would not be able to see any of these things on an oscilloscope. Take a look, you will be surprised. Both the TVI and CVI formats are pure analog High Definition.

     

    You right

    but for example 720p/60Hz transmission the carrier is at 58.559489MHz


  10. Hi ak357,

     

    I have contacted the only guys I could find in UK that support Avigilon, hoping they get back to me (tech guy was on other line so expecting a callback).

     

    What price range are we talking per NVR, could not find anything anywhere online. I would need 64 channels support per location (and three locations), can be either single box or multiple boxes of 32channel min.

     

    Max

    Check your PM

×