Jump to content
Firefighter

Do/Would you display a Video Security sign?

Recommended Posts


No. Narrow laminated glass jobs. The glass is about 7mm thick. Able to be struck by a hammer without caving in. Plus laminated glass behind the over-kill steel doors. Plus 10 foot tall enclosed steel side gate.

Home invasions are just another reality of life.

If we live in an aggressive society, then we need aggressive solutions.

So the problem escalates...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Public Urination.

Here's another one of Joe Citizen when he thinks nobody is watching.

Wow, and you're giving Tom crap over his joke link...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fiona, I think you're a little more paranoid than most people.

 

Can't decide if you'd make a good neighbor or a bad one. I do like the idea of posting shame posters up though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess you've never lived next to Failed State types. Ever experienced an attempted Home Invasion? Ever had Failed State Mongrels threaten to kill you? No. Probably not. For most of you, Security is either a source of income or a some kind of hobby. For some of us, it is a means of surviving in our homes.

I had posted other still shots of violent encounters which Soundy removed. I had also asked him to remove a pornographic image demeaning to women. When he failed to do this, I started posting images demeaning to 'men'. The only difference in the two forms of image is that the males were breaking the law in public. What the porno deal is hardly matters. The fact is that Soundy didn't remove it. If you are such a hero with 'jokes' like this Soundy, why don't you pull that stunt within a State Institution. If you did this at a University or a Hospital or a Government facility, you would be finished in your career for the duration. But oh, no, just do it against this easy target. What a hero.

 

Chris, you suggested that I 'locked the door but forgot to lock the window' so to speak. When I described other measures I have taken to prevent forced entry, you jumped to comments about living next to me. This is not a rational train of thought.

 

N.B. It always amazes me to witness people who cannot get beyond their own subjectivity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quit being so defensive!

 

I only pointed out the window thing because an excessive amount of people often put $200 worth of locking hardware on their front door thinking it's secure, and they have nice ornamental windows going down both sides of the door which are completely unprotected.

 

As for the neighbor comment, having surveillance is one thing, you seem to be actively watching everything in a 250' radius though. I'm actually amazed at how many incidents you've managed to capture.

 

I also don't live in the best place in the world, I just try to go by unnoticed and keep plenty of guns around. I'd like to think I'd shoot first, but I'll never know until I'm actually put in the situation which hopefully never happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm actually amazed at how many incidents you've managed to capture.

 

Me too. If I need a CCTV operator to watch my cameras remotely I know who to call. How much do you charge?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More like 350 feet.

I wish other countries had your 2nd Amendment: The Right to Bear Arms.

I have a close friend who fled persecution in South America. She had most of her family thrown out of the back of a moving aircraft at 15,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean. People like Pinochet and his cronies were the enforcers of such policies and were trained at the School of the Americas in Georgia. I wonder if her family call her paranoid? Oh no, wait a minute, she doesn't have any family left so they can't.

School_of_Americas_US_Government_Terrorist_Training.gif.3dcd7b017964dc19e7285880165ce668.gif

School-of-Americas.jpg.45a8778b9c5a803530c217d8057e7b14.jpg

Edited by Guest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well sorry to disappoint, but you're not going to stop a dictator and his military with any security.

 

So far I've seen you get upset over a lot of victim less crimes. Good on you for capturing the perv's and the violent offenders, but while I can't condone riding a dirt bike in a park, kids will be kids. The wanted posters are an awesome way to get it stop though! " title="Applause" />

 

Have you ever considered relocating?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like Rory and Fiona need to duke it out for the title of Who Lives In The Most Crime-Ridden, Dangerous Place That I'll Never Leave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello? Who was/is behind the dictator? In which country would I find Georgia?

I wouldn't call three drug houses within 400 feet 'victimless'.

I wouldn't call a gang of organised Welfare Theives 'victimless' either.

Relocate? Is that a euphenism for 'retreat' or 'give-up'?

If people don't want to hear about life in a crime-ridden suburb, then they can avoid my posts. Simple as that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far you've only posted pictures of guys pissing on the ground and a kid riding a bike through an empty playground... unless you're a gardener, I'd say those are pretty victimless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well sorry to disappoint, but you're not going to stop a dictator and his military with any security.

 

So far I've seen you get upset over a lot of victim less crimes. Good on you for capturing the perv's and the violent offenders, but while I can't condone riding a dirt bike in a park, kids will be kids. The wanted posters are an awesome way to get it stop though! " title="Applause" />

 

Have you ever considered relocating?

Hello? Who was/is behind the dictator? In which country would I find Georgia?

I wouldn't call three drug houses within 400 feet 'victimless'.

I wouldn't call a gang of organised Welfare Thieves 'victimless' either.

Relocate? Is that a euphenism for 'retreat' or 'give-up'?

If people don't want to hear about life in a crime-ridden suburb, then they can avoid my posts. Simple as that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Soundy, I didn't realise this was a Show and Tell class:

 

How about three gunshots and a guy running out of the house afterwards.

How about a guy covered in blood staggering across the front of my house before the Keystone Cops speed past?

How about multiple car thefts?

What on Earth do you call a 'victimless crime'?

Tell you what, if a can get an actual murder for you, I will email you the images. Okay?

I am concerned about posting anything too close to the mark because I don't want a bullet through my window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

150 feet at night through a van windscreen.

Heroin addict sticking a needle in his arm. All this was preceded by the usual preparations: teaspoon with lighter beneath it to melt cough candy before heroin added. Needle stuck into mixture; needle licked; needle stuck into arm; needle licked again. Not bad for a home install.

This addict lived locally. After placing an appropriate poster, he decided it was time to move on.

The home invasion and blood soaked event have not been catalogued. They are on an older DVR which I replaced with the Dahua.

805069626_NewPicture(2).thumb.jpg.041f03bc6ea6879ae6b3243ed708ec0a.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So far you've only posted pictures of guys pissing on the ground and a kid riding a bike through an empty playground... unless you're a gardener, I'd say those are pretty victimless.

For the last three years I attempted to force the local Council (City Hall) to enforce dog leash laws. What a big joke eh? Dogs not on leashes.

A few months ago, a young African girl was MAULED TO DEATH nearby. It was a national story at the time. I felt like telling the media about my efforts to get dogs restrained for the last three years but I didn't bother. If they had heeded my warnings then, that little girl may still be alive today. That death caused an explosion of racial tensions; and knee-jerk reactions from various authorities followed. Now, when an eighty pound dog is running wild, the owners are jumped on and threatened with heavy fines. And yet it's all too little too late.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had also asked him to remove a pornographic image demeaning to women.

 

 

it was posted as a joke........ but lets see what you turned it into ......... something to complain about but then you have to break it down to something that you can complain about.

 

why cant it be demeaning to the guy ???...... see you look for problems that suit you.

 

 

150 feet at night through a van windscreen.

Heroin addict sticking a needle in his arm.

 

so. what has that got to do with protecting YOUR property. if you never had a PTZ you would not have seen what was going on.

 

what did your local police say when you sent it them ???

 

with regards to posting images on posts ...... how do you get away with doing that ??? is there no laws

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where to begin.

1. Sexual harassment isn't much of a joke. It didn't bother me so much as cast a shadow over your character.

Like I said previously, why don't you do that at a State Facility in the U.K. and see how far you get. Try that at a University. Please direct me to a State website where you have played a similar 'joke'.

 

2. Of course I would have seen what was going on. I just needed to look out a window. They have windows in England don't they?

 

3. The still shots were a demonstration of a camera per a request by a PM. Perhaps I should have posted shots of trees or wildlife. Native flora and fauna depictions are always popular in England. Then again, someone would have complained about the lack of criminality. Misdemeanors are always solid crowd pleasers.

 

4. Posting images on posts is approved by all the local authorities. I draw the line at posting serious crimes because I refuse to take on every wannabee gangbanger.

 

5. I don't send anything to the local Police. Usually they phone me directly or knock on my door every time there is a burglary, stabbing or car theft. I only send evidence to the Serious Crime Squad; the Drug Squad; and two other Federal Agencies.

 

That just about covers it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1. Sexual harassment isn't much of a joke. It didn't bother me so much as cast a shadow over your character

 

 

Fiona. dont be so stupid............... see you have turned was was a joke now into sexual harassment.

 

 

show me were YOU have had any sexual harassment on this forum and please look up sexual harassment and study it before you start anything.

2. Of course I would have seen what was going on. I just needed to look out a window. They have windows in England don't they?

 

yes we do...... but you never looked out of your window you used zoom to spy. does not matter if he was in his car or you zoomed into his house window regardless of what he was doing its not on your property so it is classed as spying.

 

 

3. The still shots were a demonstration of a camera per a request by a PM. Perhaps I should have posted shots of trees or wildlife. Native flora and fauna depictions are always popular in England. Then again, someone would have complained about the lack of criminality. Misdemeanors are always solid crowd pleasers.

 

 

see again what has the UK got to do with anything ............ you find a problem and make it 1000 times worse.

 

 

Paranoia [ˌpar.rəˈnoɪ.ə] (adjective: paranoid [ˈpar.rə.noɪd]) is a thought process believed to be heavily influenced by anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion. Paranoid thinking typically includes persecutory beliefs, or beliefs of conspiracy concerning a perceived threat towards oneself. Making false accusations and the general distrust of others also frequently accompany paranoia. For example, an incident most people would view as an accident, a paranoid person might make an accusation that it was intentional.

 

 

 

so fiona. just so as every other reader of this post understands I DID NOT MAKE ANY SEXUAL HARRASMENT COMMENTS TO YOU IN THIS THREAD OR ANY OTHER THREAD. so dont start that crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Repeat: Post that on a British University website and let's see what the Vice Chancellor calls it.

2. Parked on my vacant land. So bloke in van was trespassing while sticking a needle in his arm. As I said, he has left the suburb permanently.

3. Who said anything about zooming into a house window? You are inventing nonsense here.

4. You are English. Who else do you think I am referring to?

5. Just so as everyone understands, when tom was supposedly assisting with a GPS topic, he directed me to a long and labourious webpage which ended up with a PORNOGRAPHIC STILL SHOT. I asked him to remove it but he didn't.

 

Your little giggle backfired on you tom. Simple as that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with irrational argument is that most people don't understand that argument has to follow certain rules. This was first established by the likes of Plato and Aristotle. It was Aristotle who gave us the syllogism which is a rudimentary and formal structure of logic. The problem with the syllogism is that it is extremely narrow and cannot be used for induction. There are so many flaws in general argument that rules have been long established to prevent errors arising. One of the most common errors is called Ad Hominem or attacking the person. This means that argument often degenerates into personal comments which are irrelevant to the issue. There are quite a few other fallacies of argument which I will touch on from time to time.

 

Now regarding the 'wanting to be a neighbour' question, this is another example of an opinion that is superfluous to the issue of the argument. Whether a person would or wouldn't be a suitable neighbour is entirely arbitrary. Loud folk might like loud neighbours. Educated folk might like educated neighbours. Loud educated folk might like loud educated neighbours. Quiet educated folk might appreciated quiet educated neighbours. Blue collars might like to live next to upper middle class neighbours. But upper middle class neighbours probably wouldn't like to live next to blue collar folk. The list goes on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread took an ugly turn somewhere.

 

I don't pretend to know what type of world you live in Fiona, we are just sharing our thoughts and opinions pertaining to the gray area of what might be too much surveillance (to the point of invasion of privacy) or too little, of course the line in this gray area shifts depending on you're location and situation. If it's on your own property, film everything from every angle at every zoom level if you wish.

 

You need to understand we aren't attacking you, so there is no need for you to be offended or get so defensive at everyone's comments, you seem to be taking things personally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Relocate? Is that a euphenism for 'retreat' or 'give-up'?

 

Yeah, drop the pride and get the H.E. double hockey sticks out of there. Especially if you have loved ones that live with you. Not only would you be doing you a favor, but also the loved ones you live with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem with irrational argument is that most people don't understand that argument has to follow certain rules. This was first established by the likes of Plato and Aristotle. It was Aristotle who gave us the syllogism which is a rudimentary and formal structure of logic. The problem with the syllogism is that it is extremely narrow and cannot be used for induction. There are so many flaws in general argument that rules have been long established to prevent errors arising. One of the most common errors is called Ad Hominem or attacking the person. This means that argument often degenerates into personal comments which are irrelevant to the issue. There are quite a few other fallacies of argument which I will touch on from time to time.

This is the internet, not debate club. You want to invoke "proper" debate procedure, there are dedicated forums for that. This isn't one of them.

 

Repeat: Post that on a British University website and let's see what the Vice Chancellor calls it.

This also isn't a British university. The board isn't even based in Britain. What does this have to do with anything??

 

Try it the other way: try posting your pictures in /b/ and see what they say about it...

 

Now regarding the 'wanting to be a neighbour' question, this is another example of an opinion that is superfluous to the issue of the argument. Whether a person would or wouldn't be a suitable neighbour is entirely arbitrary. Loud folk might like loud neighbours. Educated folk might like educated neighbours. Loud educated folk might like loud educated neighbours. Quiet educated folk might appreciated quiet educated neighbours. Blue collars might like to live next to upper middle class neighbours. But upper middle class neighbours probably wouldn't like to live next to blue collar folk. The list goes on.

Calm, rational people don't like to live next door to paranoid people.

 

We've had two or three threads recently started by people complaining of neighbors' cameras peering over their fences and into their yards, and wondering how to block or disable those cameras. The more you post, the more you sound like the person on the other side of that fence.

 

Just sayin'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×